PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPDIX vs. COTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I (TPDIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPDIX achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than COTZX's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TPDIX has underperformed COTZX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while COTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.19% annualized return.


TPDIX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.26%
6M
0.99%
YTD
8.48%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
6.77%
ALL TIME*
5.70%

COTZX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.60%
6M
2.13%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
7.19%
ALL TIME*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPDIX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I
8.48%24.23%5.55%8.07%-5.48%12.45%9.11%14.02%-6.96%4.45%
COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
2.42%15.02%7.98%11.66%-12.92%6.44%29.61%15.15%-1.17%3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TPDIX and COTZX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.57

The correlation between TPDIX and COTZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPDIX vs. COTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPDIX
TPDIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TPDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

COTZX
COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I (TPDIX) and Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPDIXCOTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.82

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.68

8.08

-1.39

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the COTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPDIX and COTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPDIX drawdown since its inception was -22.26%, smaller than the maximum COTZX drawdown of -47.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPDIX and COTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPDIXCOTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.26%

-47.48%

+25.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-4.02%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-6.92%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.43%

-17.80%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.26%

-17.80%

-4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

-1.04%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-3.45%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

0.90%

+2.42%

Volatility

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I (TPDIX) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) at 1.57%. This indicates that TPDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPDIXCOTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.23%

1.57%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

4.51%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

5.42%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

7.42%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.97%

7.42%

+2.55%

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPDIX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than COTZX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPDIX vs. COTZX - Dividend Comparison

TPDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than COTZX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COTZX
Columbia Thermostat Fund
3.28%3.37%3.55%2.74%3.28%14.82%6.92%5.57%4.45%3.13%2.66%4.26%
TPDIX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class I
0.94%1.02%3.02%2.61%4.73%0.70%0.00%3.18%3.02%0.41%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPDIX and COTZX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDIX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to COTZX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPDIX dropped -22.26% vs COTZX's -47.48%.

TPDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPDIX and COTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer