PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TP05.L vs. VEMT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TP05.L is traded in GBp, while VEMT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TP05.L achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than VEMT.L's 1.55% return.


TP05.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

VEMT.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.13%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%-6.85%-0.44%-6.21%8.40%6.35%-1.65%-1.59%3.26%-4.52%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
1.55%4.07%8.08%3.44%-5.19%-0.56%2.53%9.67%2.79%-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TP05.L and VEMT.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.71

The correlation between TP05.L and VEMT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TP05.LVEMT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

2.44

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

6.86

-6.93

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TP05.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TP05.L and VEMT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TP05.LVEMT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

1.72

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.42

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.30

-0.36

Drawdowns

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TP05.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than VEMT.L's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TP05.L and VEMT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TP05.LVEMT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-14.64%

-8.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-4.31%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-8.59%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-11.41%

-12.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.31%

-0.50%

-21.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-5.88%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

1.53%

+2.35%

Volatility

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) at 1.33%. This indicates that TP05.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TP05.LVEMT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

1.33%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

4.50%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

6.11%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

8.13%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

9.15%

-0.16%

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TP05.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TP05.L vs. VEMT.L - Dividend Comparison

TP05.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than VEMT.L's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.06%0.06%0.07%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.01%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.92%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


TP05.L and VEMT.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TP05.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TP05.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMT.L.

TP05.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VEMT.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while VEMT.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TP05.L and 0.25% for VEMT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TP05.L and VEMT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer