PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOTR vs. TFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOTR vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than TFLR's 1.99% return.


TOTR

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.34%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-0.66%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.46%

TFLR

1D
0.03%
1M
0.68%
6M
2.03%
YTD
1.99%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
7.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.35M$3.87M$3.99M
$847.04K$553.80K$586.11K

TOTR vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
-0.66%7.41%2.43%6.27%-0.12%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.99%6.57%8.77%12.05%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTR and TFLR is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOTR vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TOTR
TOTR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TOTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TOTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TOTR vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOTRTFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.54

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.22

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

10.10

-7.49

TOTR vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTR and TFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOTR vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and TFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTRTFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-4.01%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-2.18%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-4.01%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-0.06%

-2.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-0.21%

-8.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.48%

+0.52%

Volatility

TOTR vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) at 0.48%. This indicates that TOTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTRTFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.48%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

1.77%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.09%

2.01%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.15%

3.61%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

3.61%

+2.54%

TOTR vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOTR vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than TFLR's 6.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.67%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%0.00%
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
5.38%5.14%5.32%4.71%3.45%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOTR and TFLR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOTR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to TFLR (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs TFLR's -4.01%.

On 3-year performance, TFLR leads with 7.41% vs 4.37% for TOTR. On fees, TOTR is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, TFLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOTR is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 5.38% for TOTR.

TOTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while TFLR is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.60% for TFLR.

TFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOTR and TFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer