PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOTR vs. NCPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOTR vs. NCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTR achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than NCPB's 0.47% return.


TOTR

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.27%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
10Y*

NCPB

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.53%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOTR vs. NCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
0.31%7.41%2.89%
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
0.47%7.69%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTR and NCPB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.90

The correlation between TOTR and NCPB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOTR vs. NCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOTR
TOTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
TOTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NCPB
NCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOTR vs. NCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOTRNCPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.16

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

6.87

-0.39

TOTR vs. NCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the NCPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTR and NCPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOTRNCPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.76

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

1.21

-1.25

Drawdowns

TOTR vs. NCPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTR drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than NCPB's maximum drawdown of -3.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTR and NCPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTRNCPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-3.59%

-16.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.56%

-2.88%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-1.37%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-0.92%

-8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.90%

-0.05%

Volatility

TOTR vs. NCPB - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF (TOTR) and Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF (NCPB) have volatilities of 1.25% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTRNCPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.25%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

2.63%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

3.55%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

4.34%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

4.34%

+1.88%

TOTR vs. NCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTR has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NCPB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOTR vs. NCPB - Dividend Comparison

TOTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, more than NCPB's 5.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NCPB
Nuveen Core Plus Bond ETF
5.22%5.21%5.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOTR
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
5.31%5.14%5.32%4.71%3.45%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TOTR and NCPB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NCPB has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to TOTR (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTR dropped -19.63% vs NCPB's -3.59%.

On 1-year performance, NCPB leads with 6.20% vs 5.48% for TOTR. On fees, NCPB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NCPB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NCPB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TOTR.

TOTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 5.22% for NCPB.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for TOTR and 0.30% for NCPB.

NCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOTR and NCPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer