TOTL vs. PPI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TOTL (State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF) and PPI (Astoria Real Assets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOTL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while PPI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by AXS. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TOTL returned 4.19%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for PPI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOTL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPI.

Performance

TOTL vs. PPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOTL achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than PPI's 16.99% return.

TOTL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: -0.39%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 4.02%
• 3Y*: 4.19%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 1.59%

PPI

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 15.75%
• 1Y: 37.68%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOTL vs. PPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF	-0.39%	7.68%	3.15%	5.55%	-11.59%	0.11%
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	16.99%	30.05%	6.43%	11.33%	4.04%	0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TOTL and PPI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2021	0.13

The correlation between TOTL and PPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TOTL vs. PPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOTL

TOTL Risk / Return Rank: 31
TOTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TOTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TOTL Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TOTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TOTL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

PPI

PPI Risk / Return Rank: 76
PPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PPI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PPI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOTL vs. PPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) and Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOTL	PPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	2.34	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.05	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.41	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	4.75	-3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.74	14.35	-10.61

TOTL vs. PPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the PPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOTL and PPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOTL vs. PPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOTL drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum PPI drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOTL and PPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOTL	PPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-24.54%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-7.98%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.60%	-20.70%	+14.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-2.88%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.12%	-6.47%	+3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	2.63%	-1.55%

Volatility

TOTL vs. PPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) is 1.11%, while Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that TOTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOTL	PPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	4.74%	-3.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.58%	12.91%	-10.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	16.18%	-12.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.60%	19.03%	-13.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.79%	19.03%	-14.24%

TOTL vs. PPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOTL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PPI's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOTL vs. PPI - Dividend Comparison

TOTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than PPI's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPI Astoria Real Assets ETF	1.01%	1.06%	0.60%	2.87%	2.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF	5.29%	5.23%	5.35%	4.85%	4.68%	3.07%	2.91%	3.31%	3.41%	3.00%	3.25%	2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOTL and PPI in my portfolio?

TOTL and PPI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOTL or PPI?

PPI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to TOTL (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOTL dropped -16.48% vs PPI's -24.54%.

Which ETF is better, TOTL or PPI?

On 3-year performance, PPI leads with 21.99% vs 4.19% for TOTL. On fees, TOTL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, TOTL has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOTL or PPI?

Over the 3-year period, PPI has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 4.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOTL or PPI?

TOTL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOTL or PPI?

TOTL has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 1.01% for PPI.

What is the main difference between TOTL and PPI?

TOTL is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while PPI is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: State Street and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TOTL and 0.58% for PPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.