PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOPW vs. QLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOPW vs. QLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than QLDY's 19.28% return.


TOPW

1D
-1.52%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.71%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLDY

1D
0.03%
1M
11.63%
YTD
19.28%
6M
16.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPW vs. QLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOPW and QLDY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOPW vs. QLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOPW vs. QLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOPWQLDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.60

-1.35

Drawdowns

TOPW vs. QLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, which is greater than QLDY's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and QLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOPWQLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.87%

-17.44%

-12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

0.00%

-10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-4.25%

-8.63%

Volatility

TOPW vs. QLDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOPWQLDYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

19.57%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

19.57%

+7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.36%

19.57%

+7.79%

TOPW vs. QLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than QLDY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOPW vs. QLDY - Dividend Comparison

TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.33%, more than QLDY's 21.47% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOPW and QLDY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 40.33%, compared with 21.47% for QLDY.

TOPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while QLDY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TOPW and 1.04% for QLDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOPW and QLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer