TOPW vs. GBIL

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOPW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TOPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

TOPW vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.56% return.

TOPW

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -6.75%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPW vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF	0.96%	-1.33%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.56%	1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPW and GBIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

TOPW vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOPW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOPW vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOPW	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	16.94	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	105.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	43.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	193.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1,643.20	—

Drawdowns

TOPW vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOPW	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.87%	-0.76%	-29.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.65%	0.00%	-15.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-0.04%	-12.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TOPW	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.68%	0.23%	+27.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	0.58%	+27.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.68%	0.47%	+27.21%

TOPW vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOPW vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.84%, more than GBIL's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.74%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF	44.84%	21.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOPW and GBIL in my portfolio?

TOPW and GBIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TOPW or GBIL?

On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOPW or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TOPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOPW or GBIL?

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 44.84%, compared with 3.74% for GBIL.

What is the main difference between TOPW and GBIL?

TOPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while GBIL is Government Bonds. TOPW tracks Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TOPW and 0.12% for GBIL.