PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOPC vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOPC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPC achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -18.22% return.


TOPC

1D
1.05%
1M
0.07%
YTD
11.31%
6M
10.23%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-1.13%
1M
-22.90%
YTD
-18.22%
6M
-20.19%
1Y
61.50%
3Y*
36.11%
5Y*
16.81%
10Y*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TOPC
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF
11.31%25.80%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-18.22%119.04%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPC and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOPC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOPC
TOPC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOPC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOPCSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.21

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.77

2.71

+10.07

TOPC vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOPC and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOPC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPC drawdown since its inception was -8.04%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPC and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOPCSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-76.28%

+68.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-50.97%

+42.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-50.11%

+49.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-44.66%

+43.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

22.80%

-21.02%

Volatility

TOPC vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) is 4.78%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that TOPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOPCSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

15.47%

-10.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

59.51%

-49.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

60.86%

-48.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.54%

36.74%

-24.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.54%

32.16%

-19.62%

TOPC vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOPC vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

TOPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%
TOPC
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF
1.04%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOPC and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to TOPC (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOPC dropped -8.04% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 61.50% vs 22.63% for TOPC. On fees, TOPC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TOPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 61.50% return vs 22.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOPC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

TOPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

TOPC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. TOPC tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TOPC and 0.50% for SLV.

TOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOPC and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer