PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOPC vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOPC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPC achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.70% return.


TOPC

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.19%
6M
7.64%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.40%

IBIT

1D
1.49%
1M
3.57%
6M
-31.99%
YTD
-25.70%
1Y
-44.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TOPC
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF
9.97%25.80%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.70%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPC and IBIT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOPC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOPC
TOPC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TOPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TOPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOPC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TOPCIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.83

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

-0.84

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.82

-1.34

+12.15

TOPC vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOPC and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOPC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPC drawdown since its inception was -8.04%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPC and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOPCIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-53.30%

+45.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-53.30%

+45.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-48.25%

+46.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-17.81%

+16.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

33.42%

-31.63%

Volatility

TOPC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF (TOPC) is 3.05%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 10.67%. This indicates that TOPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOPCIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

10.67%

-7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

34.60%

-25.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

44.40%

-32.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

49.85%

-37.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

49.85%

-37.44%

TOPC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOPC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TOPC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

TOPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%
TOPC
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF
1.06%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOPC and IBIT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to TOPC (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOPC dropped -8.04% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, TOPC leads with 19.27% vs -44.68% for IBIT. On fees, TOPC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TOPC has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TOPC has performed better with a 19.27% return vs -44.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOPC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

TOPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

TOPC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. TOPC tracks S&P 500 3% Capped Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TOPC and 0.25% for IBIT.

TOPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOPC and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer