TOP vs. MAGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares (TOP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS).

MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023.

Performance

TOP vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares (TOP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TOP vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TOP Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares	-17.60%	-34.31%	-17.74%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.16%	22.99%	14.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOP achieves a -17.60% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -12.16% return.

TOP

• 1D: -3.48%
• 1M: -18.01%
• YTD: -17.60%
• 6M: -35.81%
• 1Y: -33.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -9.36%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TOP vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOP

TOP Risk / Return Rank: 24
TOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TOP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TOP Martin Ratio Rank: 21

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOP vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares (TOP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TOP	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	0.99	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	1.61	-1.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.21	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	1.49	-2.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	5.25	-6.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TOP vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOP Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOP and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TOP	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	0.99	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	1.34	-1.91

Correlation

The correlation between TOP and MAGS is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TOP vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

TOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
TOP Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.68%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%

Drawdowns

TOP vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOP drawdown since its inception was -66.57%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOP and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOP	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.57%	-29.91%	-36.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-66.39%	-18.62%	-47.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.48%	-14.87%	-40.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.01%	-4.75%	-28.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.79%	5.29%	+26.50%

Volatility

TOP vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Zhong Yang Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares (TOP) has a higher volatility of 47.21% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.36%. This indicates that TOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOP	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.21%	8.36%	+38.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.79%	15.45%	+36.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.02%	28.68%	+55.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.16%	26.29%	+48.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.16%	26.29%	+48.87%