PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TON-USD vs. FIL-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toncoin (TON-USD) and FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TON-USD achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than FIL-USD's -29.98% return.


TON-USD

1D
-5.73%
1M
12.37%
YTD
12.06%
6M
12.63%
1Y
-41.64%
3Y*
2.00%
5Y*
10Y*

FIL-USD

1D
5.15%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-29.98%
6M
-43.30%
1Y
-65.53%
3Y*
-42.06%
5Y*
-59.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TON-USD
Toncoin
12.06%-69.91%138.49%6.02%-40.95%437.29%
FIL-USD
FilecoinFutures
-29.98%-73.81%-28.62%130.09%-91.21%-54.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TON-USD and FIL-USD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2021

0.45

The correlation between TON-USD and FIL-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TON-USD
TON-USD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TON-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TON-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TON-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TON-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TON-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FIL-USD
FIL-USD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FIL-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toncoin (TON-USD) and FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TON-USDFIL-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.54

-0.54

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.45

-0.66

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.94

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.86

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

-1.26

+0.33

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TON-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the FIL-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TON-USD and FIL-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TON-USDFIL-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

-0.54

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.16

+0.38

Drawdowns

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TON-USD drawdown since its inception was -85.31%, smaller than the maximum FIL-USD drawdown of -99.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TON-USD and FIL-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TON-USDFIL-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.31%

-99.58%

+14.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.28%

-76.17%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.31%

-93.03%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.28%

-99.53%

+22.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.02%

-81.88%

+29.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.00%

60.67%

-17.67%

Volatility

TON-USD vs. FIL-USD - Volatility Comparison

Toncoin (TON-USD) has a higher volatility of 41.81% compared to FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) at 30.36%. This indicates that TON-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIL-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TON-USDFIL-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.81%

30.36%

+11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.74%

61.50%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.32%

101.27%

-36.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.06%

87.81%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.06%

131.88%

-41.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


TON-USD and FIL-USD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TON-USD has higher volatility (41.81%) compared to FIL-USD (30.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TON-USD dropped -85.31% vs FIL-USD's -99.58%.

FIL-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TON-USD and FIL-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer