PortfoliosLab logo
FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FIL-USD and MATIC-USD is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


FIL-USD

YTD

-36.50%

1M

27.74%

6M

-26.44%

1Y

-43.99%

5Y*

-10.13%

10Y*

N/A

MATIC-USD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIL-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIL-USD is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIL-USD is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIL-USD is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIL-USD is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIL-USD is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIL-USD is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MATIC-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATIC-USD is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Drawdowns

FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

FIL-USD vs. MATIC-USD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...