TOLZ vs. XLI
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds - TOLZ tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index while XLI tracks the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.80%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for XLI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
TOLZ vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 13.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 7.80%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 16.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
XLI
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
TOLZ vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.63% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.88% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and XLI is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and XLI has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TOLZ vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
XLI
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
XLI
-
Utilities
TOLZ
XLI
Real Estate
TOLZ
XLI
-
Industrials
TOLZ
XLI
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
XLI
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
XLI
Technology
TOLZ
XLI
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
XLI
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
XLI
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
XLI
TOLZ vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOLZ | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 1.99 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | 7.88 | +1.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOLZ | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.57 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.72 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -62.26% | +22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -12.21% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -18.49% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -21.64% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -42.33% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -1.25% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -9.20% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 3.07% | -1.36% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.60%, while Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 4.88% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.21% | 12.81% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 15.40% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 17.43% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 19.98% | -3.68% |
TOLZ vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.62% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and XLI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to TOLZ (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.02% vs 7.80% for TOLZ. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.08% for XLI.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer