TOLZ vs. SSO
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ returned 7.84%/yr vs 24.62%/yr for SSO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
TOLZ vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 16.27% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLZ has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 7.84%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.62% annualized return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
SSO
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 16.27%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 49.34%
- 3Y*
- 35.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 24.62%
TOLZ vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.11% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 20.47% | -9.46% | 26.84% | -7.90% | 13.28% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.27% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and SSO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2014 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TOLZ and SSO has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TOLZ vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
SSO
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
TOLZ
SSO
Utilities
TOLZ
SSO
Real Estate
TOLZ
SSO
Industrials
TOLZ
SSO
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
SSO
Financial Services
TOLZ
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
SSO
Technology
TOLZ
SSO
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
SSO
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
SSO
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
SSO
TOLZ vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.73 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 11.61 | -2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -84.67% | +45.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -18.17% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | -35.21% | +23.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -46.73% | +24.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | -59.34% | +20.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -3.96% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -19.53% | +12.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 4.26% | -2.48% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.17%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 9.26% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 19.46% | -11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 24.79% | -14.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 33.82% | -19.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 35.99% | -19.73% |
TOLZ vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than SSO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.67% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and SSO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to TOLZ (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.62% vs 7.84% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.63% for SSO.
TOLZ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer