TOLZ vs. RIFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. TOLZ is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, TOLZ returned 16.22% vs 15.55% for RIFR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.

Performance

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than RIFR's 9.78% return.

TOLZ

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: 11.11%
• 6M: 12.03%
• 1Y: 16.22%
• 3Y*: 14.79%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 7.84%

RIFR

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	11.11%	6.33%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	9.78%	7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TOLZ and RIFR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.88

The correlation between TOLZ and RIFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TOLZ vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOLZ

TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 51
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

RIFR

RIFR Risk / Return Rank: 44
RIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
RIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
RIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOLZ	RIFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.47	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.04	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.29	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	7.07	+2.05

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOLZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the RIFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOLZ and RIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and RIFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOLZ	RIFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.33%	-6.80%	-32.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-6.80%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-3.16%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.61%	-1.66%	-4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	2.20%	-0.42%

Volatility

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) have volatilities of 3.17% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOLZ	RIFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	3.33%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	8.69%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.40%	10.66%	-0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.98%	10.68%	+3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.26%	10.68%	+5.58%

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOLZ vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison

TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than RIFR's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	0.89%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF	3.67%	3.99%	3.53%	3.34%	3.01%	3.28%	3.16%	2.96%	3.63%	3.30%	2.62%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOLZ and RIFR in my portfolio?

TOLZ and RIFR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOLZ or RIFR?

RIFR has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TOLZ (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs RIFR's -6.80%.

Which ETF is better, TOLZ or RIFR?

On 1-year performance, TOLZ leads with 16.22% vs 15.55% for RIFR. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOLZ or RIFR?

Over the 1-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 16.22% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOLZ or RIFR?

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOLZ or RIFR?

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.89% for RIFR.

What is the main difference between TOLZ and RIFR?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 0.59% for RIFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.