TOLZ vs. HVAC
TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) and HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. TOLZ is passively managed, while HVAC is actively managed. Over the past year, TOLZ returned 16.22% vs 62.74% for HVAC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOLZ charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HVAC.
Performance
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLZ achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than HVAC's 39.55% return.
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 12.03%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.84%
HVAC
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 39.55%
- 6M
- 36.71%
- 1Y
- 62.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.11% | 13.78% |
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 39.55% | 23.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLZ and HVAC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.27 |
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOLZ
HVAC
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
TOLZ
HVAC
-
Utilities
TOLZ
HVAC
Real Estate
TOLZ
HVAC
Industrials
TOLZ
HVAC
Consumer Defensive
TOLZ
HVAC
-
Financial Services
TOLZ
HVAC
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOLZ
HVAC
Technology
TOLZ
HVAC
Basic Materials
TOLZ
-
HVAC
-
Communication Services
TOLZ
-
HVAC
-
Healthcare
TOLZ
-
HVAC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOLZ vs. HVAC — Risk / Return Rank
TOLZ
HVAC
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOLZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.25 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 14.41 | -5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLZ drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than HVAC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLZ and HVAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -21.22% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -14.83% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | 0.00% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -3.98% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 4.37% | -2.59% |
Volatility
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) is 3.17%, while AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that TOLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HVAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOLZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 11.32% | -8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 24.03% | -15.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 28.99% | -18.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 30.05% | -16.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 30.05% | -13.79% |
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLZ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than HVAC's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOLZ vs. HVAC - Dividend Comparison
TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than HVAC's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.67% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOLZ and HVAC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HVAC has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to TOLZ (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOLZ dropped -39.33% vs HVAC's -21.22%.
On 1-year performance, HVAC leads with 62.74% vs 16.22% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HVAC has performed better with a 62.74% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.14% for HVAC.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TOLZ and 1.00% for HVAC.
HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOLZ and HVAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer