TOLIX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
TOLIX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jun 23, 2008. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLIX DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.00% | 12.73% | 11.98% | 1.93% | -9.26% | 20.37% | -1.90% | 29.21% | -11.05% | 13.61% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOLIX achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TOLIX has underperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 7.12%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.
TOLIX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOLIX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TOLIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
TOLIX
CSUIX
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOLIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.67 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 2.21 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 2.42 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 10.58 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOLIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.67 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.64 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TOLIX and CSUIX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
TOLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%, more than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOLIX DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund | 10.04% | 10.99% | 9.47% | 2.67% | 8.92% | 6.06% | 1.68% | 2.00% | 2.57% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 1.86% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOLIX drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOLIX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOLIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.68% | -52.01% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -7.99% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | -20.01% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.19% | -35.01% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -4.36% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -8.21% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.82% | +0.23% |
Volatility
TOLIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund (TOLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that TOLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOLIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 6.90% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.04% | 11.49% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 12.86% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 14.88% | +0.99% |