TOL vs. CTAS
TOL (Toll Brothers, Inc.) and CTAS (Cintas Corporation) are both stocks. TOL operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while CTAS operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TOL returned 20.47%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for CTAS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TOL vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOL achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, TOL has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 20.47%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.86% annualized return.
TOL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- 13.72%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 34.42%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 23.32%
- 10Y*
- 20.47%
CTAS
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- -21.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.86%
TOL vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOL Toll Brothers, Inc. | 16.81% | 8.28% | 23.45% | 108.62% | -29.97% | 68.43% | 11.53% | 21.40% | -30.69% | 55.85% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | -6.89% | 3.78% | 22.24% | 34.82% | 2.97% | 26.51% | 32.74% | 61.73% | 9.04% | 36.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOL and CTAS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.31 |
The correlation between TOL and CTAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TOL:
$15.13B
CTAS:
$70.88B
TOL:
$13.19
CTAS:
$4.75
TOL:
11.94
CTAS:
36.65
TOL:
0.54
CTAS:
2.57
TOL:
2.41
CTAS:
6.44
TOL:
1.78
CTAS:
14.80
TOL:
$6.37B
CTAS:
$11.03B
TOL:
$2.71B
CTAS:
$1.33B
TOL:
$1.76B
CTAS:
$2.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOL vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank
TOL
CTAS
TOL vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOL | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.84 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.80 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | -1.32 | +4.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOL vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOL drawdown since its inception was -76.39%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOL and CTAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOL | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.39% | -65.32% | -11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -27.23% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.97% | -27.68% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -27.68% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.11% | -48.38% | -24.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -22.74% | +17.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.22% | -15.05% | -17.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.16% | 16.44% | -6.28% |
Volatility
TOL vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) has a higher volatility of 13.56% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 9.11%. This indicates that TOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOL | CTAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.56% | 9.11% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.16% | 16.38% | +10.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.50% | 21.00% | +14.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.31% | 22.66% | +13.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.22% | 26.72% | +14.50% |
Dividends
TOL vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
TOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than CTAS's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 1.03% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.99% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
TOL Toll Brothers, Inc. | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.71% | 0.81% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TOL vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Toll Brothers, Inc. and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TOL vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
TOL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Toll Brothers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 568.77M and revenue of -2.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -26.5%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.
TOL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Toll Brothers, Inc. reported an operating income of 346.64M and revenue of -2.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.2%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.
TOL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Toll Brothers, Inc. reported a net income of 260.59M and revenue of -2.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.2%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TOL and CTAS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOL has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to CTAS (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOL dropped -76.39% vs CTAS's -65.32%.
TOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOL and CTAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer