PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOKE vs. CNBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TOKE vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Cannabis ETF (TOKE) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TOKE vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TOKE
Cambria Cannabis ETF
-14.29%21.18%-6.39%-9.28%-45.07%-12.91%1.52%-37.55%
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
-19.71%15.33%-29.41%-16.11%-63.98%-19.02%31.94%-44.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOKE achieves a -14.29% return, which is significantly higher than CNBS's -19.71% return.


TOKE

1D
3.33%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-14.29%
6M
-17.35%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
-2.25%
5Y*
-21.57%
10Y*

CNBS

1D
3.35%
1M
1.68%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-25.83%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
-12.81%
5Y*
-37.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TOKE vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOKE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than CNBS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TOKE vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOKE
TOKE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TOKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOKE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TOKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOKE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOKE vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Cannabis ETF (TOKE) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOKECNBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.34

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.39

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

0.68

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.56

1.34

+0.22

TOKE vs. CNBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOKE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the CNBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOKE and CNBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOKECNBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.34

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

-0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

-0.46

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TOKE and CNBS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TOKE vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

TOKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TOKE
Cambria Cannabis ETF
1.06%0.91%6.62%4.20%2.11%3.54%4.33%2.26%
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%

Drawdowns

TOKE vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOKE drawdown since its inception was -83.27%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOKE and CNBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TOKECNBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.27%

-95.71%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.30%

-51.25%

+24.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.40%

-94.21%

+15.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.02%

-93.00%

+15.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.97%

-70.74%

+9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

25.95%

-14.09%

Volatility

TOKE vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Cannabis ETF (TOKE) is 9.28%, while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a volatility of 22.14%. This indicates that TOKE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TOKECNBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

22.14%

-12.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.85%

75.61%

-44.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.84%

101.71%

-57.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.60%

62.86%

-30.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.02%

60.38%

-24.36%