TOGA vs. LENS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TOGA (Tremblant Global ETF) and LENS (Sarmaya Thematic ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TOGA returned -11.25% vs 43.94% for LENS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOGA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LENS.

Performance

TOGA vs. LENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOGA achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than LENS's 2.62% return.

TOGA

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: -13.46%
• 6M: -14.10%
• 1Y: -11.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LENS

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -9.94%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: -0.39%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOGA vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	-13.46%	7.43%
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	2.62%	56.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TOGA and LENS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

TOGA vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOGA

TOGA Risk / Return Rank: 5
TOGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TOGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TOGA Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TOGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TOGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

LENS

LENS Risk / Return Rank: 45
LENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
LENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LENS Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LENS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOGA vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOGA	LENS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.60	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.61	1.98	-2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.29	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	2.03	-2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	5.91	-6.76

TOGA vs. LENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOGA Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the LENS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOGA and LENS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOGA vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOGA drawdown since its inception was -28.50%, which is greater than LENS's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOGA and LENS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOGA	LENS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.50%	-21.79%	-6.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.50%	-21.79%	-6.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.83%	-21.79%	+2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.71%	-4.24%	-2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.21%	7.46%	+5.75%

Volatility

TOGA vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tremblant Global ETF (TOGA) is 7.40%, while Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS) has a volatility of 8.43%. This indicates that TOGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOGA	LENS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	8.43%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.19%	23.15%	-5.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.10%	27.68%	-6.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.11%	25.88%	-4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	25.88%	-4.77%

TOGA vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOGA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOGA vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison

TOGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LENS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

Position	TTM	2025
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	1.56%	1.60%
TOGA Tremblant Global ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOGA and LENS in my portfolio?

TOGA and LENS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOGA or LENS?

LENS has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to TOGA (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOGA dropped -28.50% vs LENS's -21.79%.

Which ETF is better, TOGA or LENS?

On 1-year performance, LENS leads with 43.94% vs -11.25% for TOGA. On fees, TOGA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, TOGA has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOGA or LENS?

Over the 1-year period, LENS has performed better with a 43.94% return vs -11.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOGA or LENS?

TOGA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOGA or LENS?

LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for TOGA.

What is the main difference between TOGA and LENS?

They also come from different issuers: Tremblant Advisors and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for TOGA and 0.79% for LENS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LENS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.