PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOCQX vs. FGRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOCQX achieves a 23.02% return, which is significantly higher than FGRTX's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TOCQX has underperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.


TOCQX

1D
2.57%
1M
9.65%
YTD
23.02%
6M
25.54%
1Y
48.72%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
15.02%

FGRTX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.41%
YTD
10.50%
6M
12.42%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
25.59%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TOCQX
Tocqueville Fund
23.02%22.96%20.70%16.82%-13.72%25.81%12.58%29.34%-7.23%20.38%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
10.50%26.92%25.98%26.51%-8.98%26.29%12.96%31.07%-7.44%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TOCQX and FGRTX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1998

0.90

The correlation between TOCQX and FGRTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOCQX vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOCQX
TOCQX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TOCQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOCQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOCQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TOCQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOCQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOCQXFGRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

3.59

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.47

16.31

+5.15

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOCQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOCQX and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOCQXFGRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.70

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.98

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Drawdowns

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOCQX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOCQX and FGRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOCQXFGRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.34%

-56.17%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-8.99%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-18.51%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-23.35%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

-35.18%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-8.72%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.98%

+0.34%

Volatility

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

Tocqueville Fund (TOCQX) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 2.71%. This indicates that TOCQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOCQXFGRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

2.71%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

9.06%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

11.98%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.70%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

18.12%

+0.18%

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOCQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOCQX vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

TOCQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than FGRTX's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.52%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%
TOCQX
Tocqueville Fund
5.50%6.77%8.65%5.91%5.05%10.71%3.38%7.10%9.39%9.73%5.66%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOCQX and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TOCQX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to FGRTX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOCQX dropped -54.34% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

TOCQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOCQX and FGRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer