PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOAK vs. EPSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOAK vs. EPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than EPSV's 26.46% return.


TOAK

1D
0.03%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.55%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPSV

1D
1.86%
1M
6.53%
YTD
26.46%
6M
28.84%
1Y
48.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOAK vs. EPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOAK and EPSV is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOAK vs. EPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOAK
TOAK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TOAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TOAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOAK Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EPSV
EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOAK vs. EPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TOAKEPSVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

2.75

-1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

3.84

-1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.47

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

5.34

-3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.11

18.55

-10.44

TOAK vs. EPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOAK Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the EPSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOAK and EPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOAKEPSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.75

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.82

2.67

-0.85

Drawdowns

TOAK vs. EPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum EPSV drawdown of -8.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and EPSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOAKEPSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-8.93%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.81%

-8.93%

+7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

0.00%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-1.68%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

2.57%

-2.11%

Volatility

TOAK vs. EPSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) is 2.72%, while Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that TOAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOAKEPSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

6.13%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

12.82%

-9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

17.76%

-14.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.22%

18.17%

-15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.22%

18.17%

-15.95%

TOAK vs. EPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSV's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOAK vs. EPSV - Dividend Comparison

TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOAK and EPSV have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPSV has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to TOAK (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOAK dropped -1.81% vs EPSV's -8.93%.

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 48.59% vs 3.70% for TOAK. On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TOAK has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 48.59% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

EPSV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.

TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while EPSV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.88% for EPSV.

EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOAK and EPSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer