TOAK vs. BESF
TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TOAK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
TOAK vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOAK achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 19.74% return.
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 1.32% | 2.34% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.74% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOAK and BESF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOAK vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
TOAK
BESF
TOAK vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOAK | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOAK | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.82 | 2.87 | -1.05 |
Drawdowns
TOAK vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOAK drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOAK and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOAK | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -9.89% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -5.88% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -2.45% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility
TOAK vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOAK | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 24.33% | -21.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 24.33% | -22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 24.33% | -22.11% |
TOAK vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOAK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOAK vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BESF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.68% | 6.39% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOAK and BESF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.
TOAK is categorized as Multistrategy, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TOAK and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for TOAK and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer