TNXAX vs. GRSPX
TNXAX (1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A) and GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, TNXAX returned 5.54%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for GRSPX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNXAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GRSPX.
Performance
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNXAX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.59% return.
TNXAX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
GRSPX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 21.59%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNXAX 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 5.31% | 10.19% | 8.37% | 9.11% | -8.74% | 10.02% | 13.24% | 18.22% | -4.28% | 8.13% |
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 21.59% | 6.12% | 16.03% | 11.95% | -8.62% | 26.89% | 3.81% | 20.84% | -10.21% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TNXAX and GRSPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between TNXAX and GRSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TNXAX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank
TNXAX
GRSPX
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (TNXAX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNXAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.99 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | 12.80 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNXAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.04 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.70 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum GRSPX drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNXAX and GRSPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNXAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -35.67% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.58% | -7.97% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.89% | -19.33% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.80% | -19.33% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -4.81% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.39% | -0.93% |
Volatility
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A (TNXAX) is 1.80%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that TNXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TNXAX | GRSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 5.49% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 11.74% | -7.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.52% | 15.60% | -10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.86% | 15.57% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.00% | 15.36% | -6.36% |
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNXAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TNXAX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison
TNXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than GRSPX's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRSPX Greenspring Fund | 7.73% | 9.40% | 7.14% | 6.84% | 8.04% | 7.69% | 2.39% | 7.89% | 11.05% | 9.63% | 6.81% | 5.34% |
TNXAX 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A | 7.86% | 7.45% | 9.48% | 5.31% | 4.42% | 9.95% | 7.91% | 5.34% | 4.75% | 6.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TNXAX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRSPX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to TNXAX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNXAX dropped -20.07% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.
TNXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TNXAX and GRSPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer