PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNSHX vs. TCIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNSHX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than TCIEX's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TNSHX has underperformed TCIEX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while TCIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.


TNSHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.96%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.83%

TCIEX

1D
0.33%
1M
4.10%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.87%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.61%5.31%4.03%4.05%-3.96%-0.57%3.26%4.05%1.31%0.70%
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
9.52%31.55%3.69%18.21%-14.19%11.30%8.13%21.82%-13.27%25.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TNSHX and TCIEX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.03

Over the past year, TNSHX and TCIEX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNSHX vs. TCIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNSHX
TNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TCIEX
TCIEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TCIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TCIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNSHXTCIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.42

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.86

2.04

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.26

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.89

+1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.42

7.06

+5.36

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the TCIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNSHX and TCIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNSHXTCIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.42

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.55

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.57

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.41

+0.64

Drawdowns

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum TCIEX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNSHX and TCIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNSHXTCIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-59.27%

+53.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.13%

-11.35%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.13%

-13.58%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-29.25%

+23.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.99%

-33.58%

+27.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.49%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-10.58%

+9.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

3.02%

-2.72%

Volatility

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) is 0.63%, while TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class (TCIEX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that TNSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNSHXTCIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

4.65%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

12.25%

-10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

15.11%

-13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.25%

16.10%

-13.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

16.65%

-14.83%

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNSHX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TCIEX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TNSHX vs. TCIEX - Dividend Comparison

TNSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than TCIEX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCIEX
TIAA-CREF International Equity Index Fund Institutional Class
3.55%3.89%3.17%3.14%2.82%3.02%1.96%3.08%3.42%2.78%2.95%3.06%
TNSHX
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund
4.10%4.22%3.94%2.68%1.00%1.03%1.81%2.45%1.80%1.31%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNSHX and TCIEX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TCIEX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to TNSHX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNSHX dropped -5.99% vs TCIEX's -59.27%.

TNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNSHX and TCIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer