TNSHX vs. DFEQX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX).
TNSHX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Aug 7, 2015. DFEQX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 4, 2009.
Performance
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.07% | 5.31% | 4.03% | 4.05% | -3.96% | -0.57% | 3.26% | 4.05% | 1.31% | 0.70% |
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio | 0.38% | 4.27% | 5.50% | 5.44% | -5.18% | -0.60% | 2.24% | 4.51% | 1.34% | 1.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNSHX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than DFEQX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TNSHX has underperformed DFEQX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while DFEQX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.91% annualized return.
TNSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
DFEQX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNSHX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEQX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TNSHX vs. DFEQX — Risk / Return Rank
TNSHX
DFEQX
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNSHX | DFEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 4.12 | -2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | 6.61 | -3.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 2.55 | -1.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.59 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.23 | 20.66 | -7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNSHX | DFEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 4.12 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.93 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 | 1.13 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 1.11 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNSHX and DFEQX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Dividend Comparison
TNSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than DFEQX's 3.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNSHX TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.82% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 2.68% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.81% | 2.45% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
DFEQX DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio | 3.94% | 3.62% | 4.40% | 3.34% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 2.18% | 3.14% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNSHX drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum DFEQX drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNSHX and DFEQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNSHX | DFEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -8.40% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -0.76% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.99% | -8.40% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.99% | -8.40% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.55% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -0.96% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.17% | +0.14% |
Volatility
TNSHX vs. DFEQX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Index Fund (TNSHX) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) at 0.46%. This indicates that TNSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNSHX | DFEQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 0.46% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.23% | 0.66% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99% | 0.91% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 2.06% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 1.70% | +0.10% |