TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TNOW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) and PIGI.L (HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Amundi and HANetf respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TNOW.L returned 55.01% vs 15.58% for PIGI.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TNOW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for PIGI.L.

Performance

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TNOW.L is traded in USD, while PIGI.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PIGI.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNOW.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than PIGI.L's 6.25% return.

TNOW.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 17.43%
• YTD: 26.74%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 55.01%
• 3Y*: 33.44%
• 5Y*: 21.51%
• 10Y*: 24.35%

PIGI.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TNOW.L Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)	26.74%	40.51%
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF	6.25%	12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TNOW.L and PIGI.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.51

The correlation between TNOW.L and PIGI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TNOW.L	PIGI.L
Technology	40.0%	19.1%
Consumer Cyclical	20.7%	6.8%
Healthcare	16.3%	17.3%
Communication Services	10.3%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	7.4%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Financial Services	2.2%	8.6%
Industrials	0.6%	13.0%
Energy	0.2%	4.9%
Basic Materials	0.1%	5.3%
Real Estate	-	6.1%

Return for Risk

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNOW.L

TNOW.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
TNOW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TNOW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
TNOW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TNOW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PIGI.L

PIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
PIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
PIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNOW.L	PIGI.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.69	+0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.44	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.30	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	2.05	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.55	7.75	+1.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNOW.L and PIGI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNOW.L	PIGI.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	1.69	+0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.94	-0.90

Drawdowns

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNOW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than PIGI.L's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNOW.L and PIGI.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNOW.L	PIGI.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.17%	-7.74%	-28.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.03%	-7.74%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.15%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.62%	-1.22%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	2.05%	+3.69%

Volatility

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) at 2.14%. This indicates that TNOW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIGI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNOW.L	PIGI.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.27%	2.14%	+5.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.66%	7.12%	+8.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.54%	9.38%	+11.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	9.30%	+14.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.74%	9.30%	+12.44%

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNOW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PIGI.L's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNOW.L vs. PIGI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNOW.L nor PIGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNOW.L and PIGI.L in my portfolio?

TNOW.L and PIGI.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TNOW.L or PIGI.L?

On fees, TNOW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TNOW.L or PIGI.L?

TNOW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PIGI.L.

What is the main difference between TNOW.L and PIGI.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TNOW.L and 0.69% for PIGI.L.