PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TNOW.L is traded in USD, while MWRD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWRD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


TNOW.L

1D
-1.97%
1M
13.88%
YTD
24.24%
6M
23.41%
1Y
50.94%
3Y*
32.35%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
24.02%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNOW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
24.24%21.66%34.01%54.23%-31.79%29.94%43.80%46.26%-3.48%17.77%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.64%23.69%-18.69%22.97%15.27%28.71%-9.87%10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TNOW.L and MWRD.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.65

The correlation between TNOW.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNOW.L
MWRD.L

Technology

40.0%
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

20.7%
10.5%

Healthcare

16.3%
12.4%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
6.7%

Utilities

3.4%
2.4%

Financial Services

2.2%
14.7%

Industrials

0.6%
10.6%

Energy

0.2%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

TNOW.L
40.0%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TNOW.L
20.7%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Healthcare

TNOW.L
16.3%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Communication Services

TNOW.L
10.3%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

TNOW.L
6.3%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Utilities

TNOW.L
3.4%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Financial Services

TNOW.L
2.2%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Industrials

TNOW.L
0.6%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Energy

TNOW.L
0.2%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

TNOW.L
0.1%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Real Estate

TNOW.L

-

MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNOW.L
TNOW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNOW.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNOW.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

Drawdowns

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNOW.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

Volatility

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNOW.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNOW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNOW.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNOW.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TNOW.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TNOW.L.

TNOW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. TNOW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TNOW.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNOW.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer