PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TNOW.L is traded in USD, while LYPG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYPG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TNOW.L having a 24.24% return and LYPG.DE slightly lower at 23.56%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: TNOW.L at 24.02% and LYPG.DE at 24.02%.


TNOW.L

1D
-1.97%
1M
11.40%
YTD
24.24%
6M
23.00%
1Y
49.66%
3Y*
32.35%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
24.02%

LYPG.DE

1D
-1.96%
1M
13.81%
YTD
23.56%
6M
23.34%
1Y
50.99%
3Y*
32.42%
5Y*
21.05%
10Y*
24.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNOW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
24.24%21.66%34.01%54.23%-31.79%29.94%43.80%46.26%-3.48%37.54%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
23.54%23.28%32.97%53.91%-32.26%30.54%43.43%48.00%-4.12%37.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TNOW.L and LYPG.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2010

0.83

The correlation between TNOW.L and LYPG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNOW.L
TNOW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNOW.LLYPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.09

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

9.40

-0.55

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNOW.L and LYPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNOW.LLYPG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.47

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.89

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.95

+0.08

Drawdowns

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNOW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, roughly equal to the maximum LYPG.DE drawdown of -36.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNOW.L and LYPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNOW.LLYPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-36.18%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-16.40%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

-25.87%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-36.18%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.17%

-36.18%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-2.85%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-5.70%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

5.41%

+0.33%

Volatility

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) at 7.24%. This indicates that TNOW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNOW.LLYPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

7.24%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.81%

15.51%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

20.56%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

23.42%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

21.88%

-0.13%

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TNOW.L and LYPG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

TNOW.L vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNOW.L nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TNOW.L and LYPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TNOW.L and LYPG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

TNOW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNOW.L and LYPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer