PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNGY vs. FMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNGY vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNGY achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than FMUB's 0.94% return.


TNGY

1D
1.42%
1M
8.49%
6M
12.54%
YTD
18.64%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.98%

FMUB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.59%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86M$2.43M$1.70M
$575.58K$661.37K$648.60K

TNGY vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
18.64%-2.37%
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
0.94%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TNGY and FMUB is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

-0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNGY vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TNGY
TNGY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TNGY vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNGYFMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.14

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.39

7.91

-2.53

TNGY vs. FMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNGY Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FMUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNGY and FMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNGY vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNGY drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGY and FMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNGYFMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-2.74%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-2.49%

-7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.62%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-0.48%

-3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

0.67%

+3.08%

Volatility

TNGY vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) at 0.86%. This indicates that TNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNGYFMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

0.86%

+5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

2.19%

+11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

2.75%

+13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

3.59%

+13.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

3.59%

+13.15%

TNGY vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNGY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNGY vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison

TNGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than FMUB's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
3.55%2.63%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
4.47%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNGY and FMUB have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGY has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to FMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNGY dropped -9.79% vs FMUB's -2.74%.

On 1-year performance, TNGY leads with 21.86% vs 4.81% for FMUB. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TNGY has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

TNGY has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 3.55% for FMUB.

TNGY is categorized as Energy Equities, while FMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TNGY and 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNGY and FMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer