PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNGY vs. FLMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNGY vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNGY achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than FLMI's 2.47% return.


TNGY

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
11.42%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FLMI

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.42%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.68%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNGY vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TNGY and FLMI is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNGY vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNGY
TNGY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMI
FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNGY vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNGYFLMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.61

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.73

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

9.81

-5.95

TNGY vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNGY and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNGY vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNGY drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum FLMI drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGY and FLMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNGYFLMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-14.66%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-2.90%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-0.17%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-2.81%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

0.80%

+2.54%

Volatility

TNGY vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 0.67%. This indicates that TNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNGYFLMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

0.67%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

2.06%

+10.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

2.93%

+13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

4.43%

+12.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

4.71%

+11.73%

TNGY vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNGY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNGY vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

TNGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than FLMI's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
3.87%3.89%4.08%3.71%3.08%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.34%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.55%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNGY and FLMI have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to FLMI (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNGY dropped -9.79% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

On 1-year performance, TNGY leads with 12.82% vs 7.87% for FLMI. On fees, FLMI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TNGY has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLMI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.55% for TNGY.

TNGY is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLMI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise Capital and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TNGY and 0.30% for FLMI.

FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNGY and FLMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer