TMUS vs. XLK
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, TMUS returned 15.83%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for XLK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 15.83%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.
TMUS
- 1D
- -3.91%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -9.72%
- 6M
- -12.08%
- 1Y
- -24.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.09%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 15.83%
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
TMUS vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -9.72% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 10.43% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and XLK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2007 | 0.38 |
The correlation between TMUS and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
XLK
TMUS vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.52 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 4.22 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 14.16 | -15.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 3.24 | -4.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.96 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 1.06 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.42 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -82.05% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.62% | -15.92% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.99% | -25.66% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.99% | -33.56% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.99% | -33.56% | +1.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.99% | -1.00% | -30.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.95% | -34.96% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.33% | 4.74% | +12.59% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 6.53%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 6.98% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.07% | 16.68% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 20.82% | +4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 24.90% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 24.49% | +1.58% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.17% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and XLK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to TMUS (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer