PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMUS vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMUS vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 16.66%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.


TMUS

1D
1.77%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-15.76%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
16.66%

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUS vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-5.91%-6.58%39.70%15.02%20.71%-13.99%71.96%23.28%0.16%10.43%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUS and WMT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMUS:

$208.40B

WMT:

$968.20B

EPS

TMUS:

$9.41

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

TMUS:

20.09

WMT:

42.04

PEG Ratio

TMUS:

0.31

WMT:

2.75

PS Ratio

TMUS:

2.34

WMT:

1.34

PB Ratio

TMUS:

3.73

WMT:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMUS:

$90.53B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMUS:

$34.92B

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

TMUS:

$28.22B

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMUS vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUS vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMUSWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.23

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

1.83

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

5.82

-6.71

TMUS vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMUS and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMUS vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMUSWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-77.14%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-15.75%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.65%

-21.93%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.65%

-25.74%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-25.74%

-7.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.12%

-9.81%

-19.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-14.63%

-11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

4.94%

+12.93%

Volatility

TMUS vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 7.72%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMUSWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

9.86%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

18.49%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.99%

23.67%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

21.68%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

21.73%

+4.35%

Dividends

TMUS vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.08%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

TMUS vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
23.11B
177.75B
(TMUS) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TMUS vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202220232024202520260
25.1%
Portfolio components
TMUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

TMUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

TMUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMUS and WMT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs WMT's -77.14%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMUS and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer