TMUS vs. SPTE
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while SPTE (SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past year, TMUS returned -25.46% vs 72.23% for SPTE. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMUS vs. SPTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than SPTE's 41.28% return.
TMUS
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -14.03%
- 1Y
- -25.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
SPTE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- 41.28%
- 6M
- 40.63%
- 1Y
- 72.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS vs. SPTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -11.92% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 5.31% |
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF | 41.28% | 26.37% | 33.28% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and SPTE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023 | -0.12 |
The correlation between TMUS and SPTE shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. SPTE — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
SPTE
TMUS vs. SPTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMUS | SPTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.52 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 5.26 | -6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 19.27 | -20.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMUS | SPTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 3.30 | -4.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.73 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. SPTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than SPTE's maximum drawdown of -25.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and SPTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | SPTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -25.55% | -60.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -13.80% | -16.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.65% | -1.56% | -32.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -4.06% | -21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.44% | 3.76% | +13.68% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. SPTE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 6.87%, while SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | SPTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 7.64% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.13% | 17.72% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 22.01% | +3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 25.80% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 25.80% | +0.28% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. SPTE - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SPTE's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTE SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF | 0.68% | 0.96% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.23% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and SPTE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPTE has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to TMUS (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs SPTE's -25.55%.
SPTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and SPTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer