TMUS vs. LOWV
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 3 years, TMUS returned 12.41%/yr vs 15.19%/yr for LOWV. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. LOWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than LOWV's 1.77% return.
TMUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -11.83%
- 1Y
- -26.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
LOWV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS vs. LOWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -11.22% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 12.25% |
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 1.77% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 20.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and LOWV is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.16 |
The correlation between TMUS and LOWV shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. LOWV — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
LOWV
TMUS vs. LOWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMUS | LOWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.15 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.91 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 3.70 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMUS | LOWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.83 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.43 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. LOWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than LOWV's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and LOWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | LOWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -13.87% | -72.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -9.59% | -20.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -13.87% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.12% | -1.88% | -31.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -1.50% | -24.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.64% | 2.35% | +15.29% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. LOWV - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) at 2.51%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | LOWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 2.51% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 8.00% | +11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 10.54% | +14.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 11.96% | +11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 11.96% | +14.12% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. LOWV - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than LOWV's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.92% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and LOWV have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMUS has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to LOWV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs LOWV's -13.87%.
LOWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and LOWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer