TMUS vs. 0B2.DE

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) and 0B2.DE (BAWAG Group AG) are both stocks. TMUS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while 0B2.DE operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, TMUS returned 6.39%/yr vs 34.66%/yr for 0B2.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and BAWAG Group AG (0B2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TMUS is traded in USD, while 0B2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0B2.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than 0B2.DE's 21.62% return.

TMUS

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 2.52%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: -2.73%
• 1Y: -15.61%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 16.81%

0B2.DE

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 21.62%
• 6M: 26.07%
• 1Y: 49.37%
• 3Y*: 66.99%
• 5Y*: 34.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc.	-6.03%	-6.58%	39.70%	15.02%	20.71%	-13.99%	71.96%	23.28%	11.09%
0B2.DE BAWAG Group AG	21.62%	92.89%	72.21%	10.71%	-7.81%	29.05%	5.04%	6.40%	-16.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUS and 0B2.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018	0.05

The correlation between TMUS and 0B2.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUS

TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 19
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

0B2.DE

0B2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 83
0B2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
0B2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
0B2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 79
0B2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
0B2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and BAWAG Group AG (0B2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMUS	0B2.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.76	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.78	2.38	-3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.30	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.66	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	9.23	-10.10

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the 0B2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMUS and 0B2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than 0B2.DE's maximum drawdown of -55.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and 0B2.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMUS	0B2.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.29%	-55.72%	-30.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.37%	-18.94%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.65%	-18.94%	-14.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.65%	-38.73%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.21%	-2.46%	-26.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-11.34%	-14.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.94%	5.40%	+12.54%

Volatility

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Volatility Comparison

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and BAWAG Group AG (0B2.DE) have volatilities of 7.63% and 7.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMUS	0B2.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	7.85%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.08%	22.56%	-3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.03%	28.61%	-3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.91%	36.18%	-12.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.08%	43.30%	-17.22%

Dividends

TMUS vs. 0B2.DE - Dividend Comparison

TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than 0B2.DE's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
0B2.DE BAWAG Group AG	4.12%	4.28%	6.21%	7.69%	6.11%
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc.	2.09%	1.80%	1.28%	0.41%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMUS and 0B2.DE in my portfolio?

TMUS and 0B2.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.