PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSRX vs. QRPRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than QRPRX's 18.99% return.


TMSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

QRPRX

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.27%
YTD
18.99%
6M
21.26%
1Y
35.44%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
19.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
0.41%2.95%5.36%5.09%-4.69%-2.08%13.21%7.59%-2.16%
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
18.99%23.57%18.88%7.30%25.46%14.33%-20.91%-2.94%-4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TMSRX and QRPRX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.03

The correlation between TMSRX and QRPRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSRX vs. QRPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSRX
TMSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TMSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TMSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QRPRX
QRPRX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QRPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSRXQRPRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.72

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

10.44

-6.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.80

30.49

-12.69

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the QRPRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMSRX and QRPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSRXQRPRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

3.94

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

1.67

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.86

-0.03

Drawdowns

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSRX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, smaller than the maximum QRPRX drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSRX and QRPRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSRXQRPRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-28.21%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-3.46%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.79%

-11.24%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.59%

-11.24%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.18%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-7.53%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.18%

-0.98%

Volatility

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) is 0.00%, while AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that TMSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QRPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSRXQRPRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.83%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

6.75%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70%

9.21%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

11.82%

-9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

10.37%

-7.09%

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSRX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QRPRX's 4.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSRX vs. QRPRX - Dividend Comparison

TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than QRPRX's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
1.27%1.51%2.33%4.60%0.00%4.16%1.97%1.00%0.09%
TMSRX
T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund
9.49%7.59%6.72%5.95%2.29%2.88%3.35%3.00%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSRX and QRPRX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRPRX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to TMSRX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSRX dropped -10.67% vs QRPRX's -28.21%.

QRPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSRX and QRPRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer