TMSRX vs. QMFNX
TMSRX (T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund) and QMFNX (AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N) are both Multistrategy funds. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMSRX charges 1.19%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for QMFNX.
Performance
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than QMFNX's 11.43% return.
TMSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
QMFNX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 0.41% | 0.53% |
QMFNX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N | 11.43% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSRX and QMFNX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSRX vs. QMFNX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSRX
QMFNX
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N (QMFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSRX | QMFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.80 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSRX | QMFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 2.14 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSRX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, roughly equal to the maximum QMFNX drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSRX and QMFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSRX | QMFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -10.37% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -2.28% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSRX | QMFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70% | 14.36% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.76% | 14.36% | -11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 14.36% | -11.08% |
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSRX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than QMFNX's 3.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSRX vs. QMFNX - Dividend Comparison
TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than QMFNX's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMFNX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class N | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 9.49% | 7.59% | 6.72% | 5.95% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSRX and QMFNX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TMSRX and QMFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer