TMSRX vs. CSQAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX).
TMSRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 22, 2018. CSQAX is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Beta Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2012.
Performance
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 0.41% | 2.95% | 5.36% | 5.09% | -4.69% | -2.08% | 13.21% | 7.59% | -4.11% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 0.95% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 1.72% | 5.52% | 9.98% | 6.10% | 2.88% | -5.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSRX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than CSQAX's 0.95% return.
TMSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- —
CSQAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- -1.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSRX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQAX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSRX vs. CSQAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSRX
CSQAX
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | -0.15 | +1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | -0.15 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.98 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | -0.24 | +1.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | -0.39 | +6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | -0.15 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.46 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSRX and CSQAX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Dividend Comparison
TMSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, more than CSQAX's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 9.49% | 7.59% | 6.72% | 5.95% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.08% | 1.09% | 6.54% | 2.73% | 2.59% | 9.06% | 13.23% | 4.77% | 1.84% | 5.27% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSRX drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than CSQAX's maximum drawdown of -8.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSRX and CSQAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -8.37% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.84% | -5.05% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.59% | -7.28% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -4.69% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -2.07% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 3.16% | -2.66% |
Volatility
TMSRX vs. CSQAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) is 0.00%, while Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that TMSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.03% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.44% | 5.78% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10% | 7.60% | -5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 6.33% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.31% | 5.98% | -2.67% |