TMSL vs. USMF
TMSL (T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TMSL is actively managed, while USMF is passively managed. Over the past year, TMSL returned 31.37% vs 6.28% for USMF. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMSL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
TMSL vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 16.49% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.36% return.
TMSL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USMF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
TMSL vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 16.49% | 11.95% | 15.81% | 11.22% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.36% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 10.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSL and USMF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TMSL and USMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TMSL vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMSL
USMF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
TMSL
USMF
Industrials
TMSL
USMF
Financial Services
TMSL
USMF
Healthcare
TMSL
USMF
Consumer Cyclical
TMSL
USMF
Energy
TMSL
USMF
Real Estate
TMSL
USMF
Basic Materials
TMSL
USMF
Consumer Defensive
TMSL
USMF
Utilities
TMSL
USMF
Communication Services
TMSL
USMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSL vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
TMSL
USMF
TMSL vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.10 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.98 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 2.93 | +8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.58 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.63 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
TMSL vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -36.24% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -6.47% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.56% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -4.16% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.15% | +0.57% |
Volatility
TMSL vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 2.30%. This indicates that TMSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 2.30% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 7.43% | +6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.27% | 10.79% | +6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 14.27% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 16.97% | +1.42% |
TMSL vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSL vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than USMF's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSL and USMF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMSL has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to USMF (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSL dropped -24.39% vs USMF's -36.24%.
On 1-year performance, TMSL leads with 31.37% vs 6.28% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMSL has performed better with a 31.37% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMSL.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.49% for TMSL.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMSL and 0.28% for USMF.
TMSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMSL and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer