TMSL vs. FGRTX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX).
TMSL is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 14, 2023. FGRTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1998.
Performance
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 2.14% | 11.95% | 15.81% | 11.22% |
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | -5.09% | 26.92% | 25.98% | 9.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSL achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than FGRTX's -5.09% return.
TMSL
- 1D
- 4.09%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGRTX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 23.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FGRTX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSL vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank
TMSL
FGRTX
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSL | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.86 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.74 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 8.14 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSL | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.30 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.45 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSL and FGRTX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison
TMSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FGRTX's 4.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSL T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.55% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGRTX Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund | 4.10% | 3.89% | 2.68% | 2.06% | 4.38% | 4.79% | 7.96% | 12.98% | 21.72% | 15.57% | 1.97% | 4.16% |
Drawdowns
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSL drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum FGRTX drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSL and FGRTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSL | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -56.17% | +31.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.61% | -12.17% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -8.99% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -8.77% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.59% | +0.94% |
Volatility
TMSL vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF (TMSL) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 4.37%. This indicates that TMSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSL | FGRTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 4.37% | +3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 9.26% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 18.18% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 16.67% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 18.10% | +0.27% |