PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSF vs. TMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSF vs. TMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMSF

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMB

1D
-0.23%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSF vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMSF and TMB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSF vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMSF vs. TMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSFTMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.99

3.18

-1.19

Drawdowns

TMSF vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and TMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSFTMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-0.24%

-2.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.24%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.06%

-0.32%

Volatility

TMSF vs. TMB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSFTMBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

2.52%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.52%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.52%

+0.42%

TMSF vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than TMB's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSF vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison

TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than TMB's 0.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TMSF and TMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.

TMSF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Thornburg. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.55% for TMB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSF and TMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer