TMSF vs. TMB
TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) and TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TMSF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMB.
Performance
TMSF vs. TMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMSF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF vs. TMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 0.44% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSF and TMB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSF vs. TMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSF | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 3.18 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
TMSF vs. TMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, which is greater than TMB's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and TMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSF | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -0.24% | -2.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.24% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -0.06% | -0.32% |
Volatility
TMSF vs. TMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSF | TMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 2.52% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 2.52% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 2.52% | +0.42% |
TMSF vs. TMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than TMB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSF vs. TMB - Dividend Comparison
TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than TMB's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.06% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TMSF and TMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.
TMSF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Thornburg. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.55% for TMB.
Find the right allocation for TMSF and TMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer