TMPFX vs. PSDSX
TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) and PSDSX (Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TMPFX returned 2.67%/yr vs 2.65%/yr for PSDSX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMPFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PSDSX.
Performance
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMPFX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than PSDSX's 0.86% return.
TMPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PSDSX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- —
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 1.52% | 3.71% | 4.26% | 3.90% | 0.51% | -0.91% | -0.60% | 0.30% | -0.30% |
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund | 0.86% | 3.67% | 4.43% | 4.69% | -0.28% | 0.05% | 1.59% | 3.00% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMPFX and PSDSX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMPFX vs. PSDSX — Risk / Return Rank
TMPFX
PSDSX
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) and Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMPFX | PSDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 4.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.18 | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMPFX | PSDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81 | 4.00 | +2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 2.01 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 2.11 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMPFX drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, which is greater than PSDSX's maximum drawdown of -3.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMPFX and PSDSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMPFX | PSDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.03% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | 0.00% | -0.80% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | -1.29% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.52% | -1.52% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -0.19% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.16% | -0.16% |
Volatility
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) has a higher volatility of 0.16% compared to Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund (PSDSX) at 0.14%. This indicates that TMPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMPFX | PSDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.16% | 0.14% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.39% | 0.89% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56% | 0.98% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 1.35% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.81% | 1.09% | +0.72% |
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMPFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than PSDSX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMPFX vs. PSDSX - Dividend Comparison
TMPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than PSDSX's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDSX Palmer Square Ultra-Short Duration Investment Grade Fund | 3.54% | 3.57% | 4.06% | 3.57% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 1.21% | 2.51% | 2.18% | 1.50% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 3.75% | 3.81% | 4.15% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMPFX and PSDSX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMPFX has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to PSDSX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMPFX dropped -3.52% vs PSDSX's -3.03%.
TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.81 vs 4.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMPFX and PSDSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer