TMPFX vs. CULAX
TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) and CULAX (Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TMPFX returned 2.81%/yr vs 3.41%/yr for CULAX. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMPFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for CULAX.
Performance
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMPFX achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than CULAX's 1.55% return.
TMPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.50%
CULAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 2.13% | 3.71% | 4.26% | 3.90% | 0.51% | -0.91% | -0.60% | 0.30% | -0.30% |
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund | 1.55% | 4.55% | 5.69% | 6.07% | -0.56% | 0.43% | 0.66% | 3.30% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMPFX and CULAX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2018 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMPFX vs. CULAX — Risk / Return Rank
TMPFX
CULAX
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMPFX | CULAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +10.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 13.22 | 3.75 | +9.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 37.35 | 13.12 | +24.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 296.96 | 55.54 | +241.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMPFX drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, smaller than the maximum CULAX drawdown of -7.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMPFX and CULAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMPFX | CULAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -7.40% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.30% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.52% | -0.30% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.52% | -2.19% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -0.21% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.07% | -0.06% |
Volatility
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) at 0.18%. This indicates that TMPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CULAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMPFX | CULAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 0.18% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.47% | 0.88% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61% | 1.27% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.34% | 1.36% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.80% | 1.42% | +0.38% |
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMPFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CULAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMPFX vs. CULAX - Dividend Comparison
TMPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than CULAX's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CULAX Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund | 3.52% | 4.13% | 4.90% | 4.52% | 1.47% | 0.64% | 1.25% | 2.44% | 2.10% | 1.13% | 1.10% | 0.66% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 3.73% | 3.81% | 4.15% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMPFX and CULAX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMPFX has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to CULAX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMPFX dropped -3.52% vs CULAX's -7.40%.
TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.13 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMPFX and CULAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer