PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMNIX vs. AMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMNIX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMHIX's 2.23% return.


TMNIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.59%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*

AMHIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.71%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
1.46%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%2.96%6.73%8.70%0.12%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.23%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TMNIX and AMHIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.62

The correlation between TMNIX and AMHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMNIX vs. AMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMNIXAMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.67

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.02

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

10.73

-3.60

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the AMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMNIX and AMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMNIXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.77

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.36

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

1.40

-0.01

Drawdowns

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMNIX drawdown since its inception was -4.63%, smaller than the maximum AMHIX drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMNIX and AMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMNIXAMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-21.74%

+17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-2.76%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.61%

-6.25%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.63%

-17.81%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.02%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-2.12%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.78%

+0.03%

Volatility

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Volatility Comparison

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMNIXAMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.10%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

2.20%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

3.03%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

4.84%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.69%

4.53%

-1.84%

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMNIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than AMHIX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMNIX vs. AMHIX - Dividend Comparison

TMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than AMHIX's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.13%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMNIX and AMHIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMHIX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to TMNIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMNIX dropped -4.63% vs AMHIX's -21.74%.

AMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMNIX and AMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer