TMLPX vs. GAMPX
TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) and GAMPX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TMLPX returned 16.60%/yr vs 25.11%/yr for GAMPX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TMLPX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for GAMPX.
Performance
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TMLPX having a 25.97% return and GAMPX slightly higher at 26.95%.
TMLPX
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 23.04%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.30%
GAMPX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- YTD
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 29.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 25.11%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 25.97% | 3.87% | 38.51% | 5.07% | 9.12% | 23.54% | -11.25% | 15.66% | -10.40% |
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 26.95% | 5.43% | 58.40% | 15.11% | 19.15% | 38.33% | -17.23% | 17.00% | -12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMLPX and GAMPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TMLPX and GAMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMLPX vs. GAMPX — Risk / Return Rank
TMLPX
GAMPX
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMLPX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 4.07 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 9.25 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMLPX drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than GAMPX's maximum drawdown of -59.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMLPX and GAMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMLPX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.18% | -59.18% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -7.23% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -17.08% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -21.97% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.58% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -8.44% | -13.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.17% | -0.36% |
Volatility
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Volatility Comparison
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P (GAMPX) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMLPX | GAMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.26% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 11.87% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 14.88% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 20.48% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 25.69% | -3.90% |
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMLPX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than GAMPX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMLPX vs. GAMPX - Dividend Comparison
TMLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than GAMPX's 8.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAMPX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund Class P | 8.26% | 10.13% | 25.55% | 10.34% | 4.76% | 8.54% | 4.33% | 4.99% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.71% | 7.34% | 4.83% | 4.33% | 6.09% | 5.65% | 6.10% | 5.51% | 3.95% | 5.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TMLPX and GAMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TMLPX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to GAMPX (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMLPX dropped -67.18% vs GAMPX's -59.18%.
GAMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMLPX and GAMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer