PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMIFX vs. SECUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMIFX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly lower than SECUX's 16.16% return.


TMIFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.85%
YTD
10.70%
6M
9.45%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*

SECUX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.29%
YTD
16.16%
6M
16.31%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMIFX
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth
10.70%6.85%16.25%31.92%-32.11%8.15%30.28%42.96%-19.90%12.49%
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
16.16%1.86%14.29%26.43%-28.33%13.39%31.95%32.44%-7.76%17.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TMIFX and SECUX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.92

The correlation between TMIFX and SECUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMIFX vs. SECUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMIFX
TMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SECUX
SECUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SECUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SECUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMIFXSECUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.12

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

7.20

-5.13

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMIFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SECUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMIFX and SECUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMIFXSECUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.23

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.28

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.27

+0.04

Drawdowns

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMIFX drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, smaller than the maximum SECUX drawdown of -71.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMIFX and SECUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMIFXSECUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.26%

-71.68%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-9.17%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-25.43%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.26%

-37.80%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

0.00%

-12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-18.41%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.88%

2.70%

+3.18%

Volatility

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Mid Cap Growth (TMIFX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund (SECUX) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMIFXSECUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.42%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

12.56%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.18%

15.83%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.59%

21.43%

+14.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.05%

21.19%

+8.86%

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMIFX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SECUX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMIFX vs. SECUX - Dividend Comparison

TMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.23%, while SECUX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECUX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.31%41.48%6.54%14.34%2.18%27.68%12.89%0.59%14.34%
TMIFX
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth
22.23%24.61%4.10%0.00%0.00%43.24%4.67%1.66%53.57%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMIFX and SECUX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECUX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to TMIFX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMIFX dropped -55.26% vs SECUX's -71.68%.

SECUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMIFX and SECUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer