TMFX vs. QMID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - TMFX tracks the Motley Fool Next Index while QMID tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TMFX returned 10.28% vs 9.00% for QMID. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QMID.

Performance

TMFX vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than QMID's 1.24% return.

TMFX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: -0.26%
• 1Y: 10.28%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMID

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: -1.04%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFX vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	1.68%	10.41%	18.79%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	1.24%	5.02%	9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFX and QMID is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.90

The correlation between TMFX and QMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMFX vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFX

TMFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
TMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
TMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFX vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFX	QMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.60	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	0.97	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.11	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	0.85	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.34	2.85	-0.51

TMFX vs. QMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the QMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFX and QMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMFX vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than QMID's maximum drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and QMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFX	QMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-24.42%	-10.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	-10.67%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.06%	-2.94%	-1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	-5.41%	-9.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	3.16%	+1.24%

Volatility

TMFX vs. QMID - Volatility Comparison

Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) at 3.95%. This indicates that TMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMFX	QMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	3.95%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	10.77%	+2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	15.14%	+1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.33%	18.43%	+4.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.33%	18.43%	+4.90%

TMFX vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMFX vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QMID's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.51%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.06%	0.16%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFX and QMID in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, TMFX and QMID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TMFX or QMID?

TMFX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to QMID (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFX dropped -34.72% vs QMID's -24.42%.

Which ETF is better, TMFX or QMID?

On 1-year performance, TMFX leads with 10.28% vs 9.00% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMFX or QMID?

Over the 1-year period, TMFX has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFX or QMID?

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFX or QMID?

QMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.

What is the main difference between TMFX and QMID?

TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFX and 0.38% for QMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.