PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFX vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMFX vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return.


TMFX

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.95%
YTD
4.09%
6M
4.52%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
10Y*

IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFX vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TMFX
Motley Fool Next Index ETF
4.09%10.41%16.04%17.95%-28.16%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFX and IGM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022

0.80

The correlation between TMFX and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TMFX vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TMFX
IGM

Technology

28.8%
82.8%

Healthcare

17.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
0.1%

Industrials

14.1%
0.2%

Financial Services

10.5%
0.2%

Communication Services

5.6%
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Energy

0.0%
0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TMFX
28.8%
IGM
82.8%

Healthcare

TMFX
17.6%
IGM

-

Consumer Cyclical

TMFX
16.9%
IGM
0.1%

Industrials

TMFX
14.1%
IGM
0.2%

Financial Services

TMFX
10.5%
IGM
0.2%

Communication Services

TMFX
5.6%
IGM
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

TMFX
2.7%
IGM

-

Real Estate

TMFX
2.1%
IGM

-

Basic Materials

TMFX
1.6%
IGM

-

Energy

TMFX
0.0%
IGM
0.1%

Utilities

TMFX

-

IGM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMFX vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFX
TMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFX vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFXIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.50

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

3.81

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

13.36

-10.43

TMFX vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFX and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFXIGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

3.07

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.48

-0.36

Drawdowns

TMFX vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.30%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFXIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.30%

-65.59%

+31.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.95%

-16.44%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-26.39%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.84%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.38%

-15.23%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

4.67%

-0.32%

Volatility

TMFX vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) is 4.11%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that TMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMFXIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

6.10%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

16.08%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

20.43%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.39%

25.68%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

24.54%

-1.15%

TMFX vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMFX vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than IGM's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
TMFX
Motley Fool Next Index ETF
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.16%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMFX and IGM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TMFX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFX dropped -34.30% vs IGM's -65.59%.

On 3-year performance, IGM leads with 39.18% vs 13.61% for TMFX. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TMFX has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IGM has performed better with a 39.18% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGM is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFX.

IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.

TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFX and 0.46% for IGM.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMFX and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer