TMFX vs. IGM
TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Next Index, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFX returned 12.37%/yr vs 35.67%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
TMFX vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 22.65% return.
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 10.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 24.86%
TMFX vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 1.68% | 10.41% | 16.04% | 17.95% | -28.16% | -0.65% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFX and IGM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TMFX and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFX vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
TMFX
IGM
TMFX vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFX | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.92 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.34 | 9.77 | -7.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFX vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFX drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFX and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFX | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.72% | -65.59% | +30.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -16.44% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.05% | -26.39% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -7.39% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -15.21% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 4.91% | -0.51% |
Volatility
TMFX vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) is 5.40%, while iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a volatility of 11.53%. This indicates that TMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFX | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 11.53% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 18.67% | -5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 22.76% | -5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 26.07% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 24.71% | -1.38% |
TMFX vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFX vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
TMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than IGM's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFX and IGM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to TMFX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFX dropped -34.72% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 3-year performance, IGM leads with 35.67% vs 12.37% for TMFX. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TMFX has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGM has performed better with a 35.67% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TMFX.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.
TMFX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFX and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFX and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer