TMFM vs. TEKX
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and TEKX (SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TMFM returned -18.32% vs 153.57% for TEKX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TEKX.
Performance
TMFM vs. TEKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than TEKX's 78.46% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 6M
- -9.85%
- 1Y
- -18.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEKX
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 27.16%
- YTD
- 78.46%
- 6M
- 62.40%
- 1Y
- 153.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM vs. TEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -8.40% | -8.98% | 6.48% |
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 78.46% | 40.92% | 14.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and TEKX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.44 |
TMFM vs. TEKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFM
TEKX
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFM
TEKX
Healthcare
TMFM
TEKX
-
Industrials
TMFM
TEKX
Financial Services
TMFM
TEKX
Real Estate
TMFM
TEKX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TMFM
TEKX
Consumer Defensive
TMFM
TEKX
Basic Materials
TMFM
-
TEKX
Communication Services
TMFM
-
TEKX
Energy
TMFM
-
TEKX
Utilities
TMFM
-
TEKX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. TEKX — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
TEKX
TMFM vs. TEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.55 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 8.62 | -9.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 28.47 | -29.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 4.13 | -5.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 1.92 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. TEKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum TEKX drawdown of -45.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and TEKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -45.57% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -17.92% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.46% | -1.49% | -23.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -10.28% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 5.42% | +9.28% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. TEKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is 8.06%, while SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that TMFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 10.10% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 29.57% | -13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 37.44% | -18.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 44.46% | -23.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 44.46% | -23.83% |
TMFM vs. TEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TEKX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. TEKX - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TEKX's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 0.20% | 0.36% | 3.47% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and TEKX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEKX has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to TMFM (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs TEKX's -45.57%.
On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 153.57% vs -18.32% for TMFM. On fees, TEKX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TMFM has been the lower-risk option at 8.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 153.57% return vs -18.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEKX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TEKX has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and State Street Global Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.65% for TEKX.
TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and TEKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer