TMFM vs. TEKX
TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and TEKX (SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TMFM returned -16.65% vs 107.29% for TEKX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TEKX.
Performance
TMFM vs. TEKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFM achieves a -6.90% return, which is significantly lower than TEKX's 65.46% return.
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -6.90%
- 1Y
- -16.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEKX
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- 46.60%
- YTD
- 65.46%
- 1Y
- 107.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM vs. TEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -6.90% | -8.98% | 6.08% |
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 65.46% | 40.92% | 16.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFM and TEKX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TMFM and TEKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TMFM vs. TEKX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFM
TEKX
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFM
TEKX
Healthcare
TMFM
TEKX
-
Industrials
TMFM
TEKX
Financial Services
TMFM
TEKX
Real Estate
TMFM
TEKX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TMFM
TEKX
Consumer Defensive
TMFM
TEKX
Basic Materials
TMFM
-
TEKX
Communication Services
TMFM
-
TEKX
Energy
TMFM
-
TEKX
Utilities
TMFM
-
TEKX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFM vs. TEKX — Risk / Return Rank
TMFM
TEKX
TMFM vs. TEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) and SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.42 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 6.02 | -6.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 19.12 | -20.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFM vs. TEKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFM drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum TEKX drawdown of -45.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFM and TEKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -45.57% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.59% | -17.92% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.24% | -9.68% | -14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -9.97% | -6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.34% | 5.63% | +9.71% |
Volatility
TMFM vs. TEKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is 5.37%, while SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF (TEKX) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that TMFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFM | TEKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 9.21% | -3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 29.82% | -13.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 37.62% | -18.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 44.10% | -23.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 44.10% | -23.53% |
TMFM vs. TEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TEKX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFM vs. TEKX - Dividend Comparison
TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TEKX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TEKX SPDR Galaxy Transformative Tech Accelerators ETF | 0.22% | 0.36% | 3.47% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFM and TEKX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEKX has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to TMFM (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFM dropped -31.75% vs TEKX's -45.57%.
On 1-year performance, TEKX leads with 107.29% vs -16.65% for TMFM. On fees, TEKX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TMFM has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEKX has performed better with a 107.29% return vs -16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEKX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TEKX has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.07% for TMFM.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and State Street Global Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFM and 0.65% for TEKX.
TEKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFM and TEKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer